Affidavit foreclosure by market sale notice

Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.

Trending News

HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

Murtha Cullina business law firm

Email 860-240-6105 HB Ad Slot Amendment to Connecticut’s Foreclosure By Market Sale Statute Wednesday, August 3, 2016

For Sale, Amendment to Connecticut’s Foreclosure By Market Sale Statute

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

On January 1, 2015, Connecticut adopted an additional method of foreclosure known as foreclosure by market sale. This method permits an owner-occupant of a 1-4 family residential property who is in default of the first mortgage to obtain the lender’s consent to market and sell the property in order to avoid a judicial foreclosure.

Under the current statute, prior to commencing a foreclosure action, the lender is required to provide notice of the foreclosure by market sale option to the owner by registered or certified mail at the address of the residential real property secured by the mortgage. After receiving this notice, the owner has sixty (60) days to contact the lender to discuss whether it will consent to a foreclosure by market sale. If the owner fails to contact the lender within the sixty (60) day period, or if the parties are unable to reach mutually agreeable terms, or other circumstances exist which prevent the parties from proceeding with a foreclosure by market sale, then the lender may proceed with a traditional foreclosure. The lender is required, however, to file an affidavit with the court stating it complied with the notice requirement and the reason the parties are not proceeding with a foreclosure by market sale.

Effective October 1, 2016, however, a lender is no longer required to provide notice of the foreclosure by market sale option to the owner or file an affidavit with the court prior to commencing a foreclosure action.

Rather, the statute was recently amended to provide that the owner and lender may agree to pursue foreclosure by market sale and the failure of either party to consent to a foreclosure by market sale for any reason shall not be the basis for a claim of bad faith.

Despite the recent amendment, Lenders should continue to inform owners in default about the foreclosure by market sale option in order to potentially avoid costs and delays associated with a traditional judicial foreclosure.

© Copyright 2024 Murtha Cullina

Current Public Notices

Published: 4 September, 2024 Published: 30 August, 2024 Published: 30 August, 2024 Published: 28 August, 2024 Published: 27 August, 2024 Published: 26 August, 2024 HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

Current Legal Analysis

HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

More from Murtha Cullina

Upcoming Legal Education Events

Practising Law Institute New York

Practising Law Institute New York

Greenberg Traurig, LLP Law Firm

Foley and Lardner LLP Law Firm

HB Ad Slot HB Mobile Ad Slot

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding, and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free-to-use, no-log-in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates, or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys, or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws, the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 2070 Green Bay Rd., Suite 178, Highland Park, IL 60035 Telephone (708) 357-3317 or toll-free (877) 357-3317. If you would like to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2024 National Law Forum, LLC